Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGiesen, James C.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Aaron
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T19:06:35Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11668/20873
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation argues that from 1880 to 2010 the American natural and artificial Christmas tree industries remodeled themselves after one another. Artificial tree companies modeled their products after the natural tree, hoping to make them look, smell, and feel like the real thing. As these replica trees became popular, scientists, extension agents, and farmers worked to control the natural Christmas tree crop unlike ever before. Those efforts stemmed from a desire to wrest from nature the same kind of idealized silhouettes their plastic counterparts celebrated. Both industries tried to convince the country’s consumers to buy what they were selling. Through Americans’ shifting Christmas tree experience, this dissertation highlights the evolution of particular cultural and environmental ideas. It reveals how both the natural and artificial tree industries intentionally misled the public about the ecological implications of their businesses. Further, it demonstrates that although many Americans believed that the natural Christmas tree ritual could instill the children’s youth with an appreciation of the outdoors or the value of the hard work symbolized by the felling of a tree and dragging it into the living room, by the 1960s such an outlook became contested unlike ever before. As fake tree companies promised convenience, many citizens looked upon their ersatz tree as a symbol of progress and good environmental stewardship just as others worried that modernity would alienate the nation’s youth from the wild spaces and hard work of their ancestors. This dissertation also considers how gender animated the trade by showing how farmers frequently blamed the nation’s women for their reliance on pesticides. That chemical dependency, farmers maintained, was the only way to grow the shapely trees the nation’s women supposedly demanded. Growers also trivialized the work of women within the business in an effort to bolster their own masculine image. As the crop spawned festivals in some communities, locals equated tree bodies with those of women, overtly implying that beauty was most important in both.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipForest History Societyen_US
dc.subjectChristmas treeen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental historyen_US
dc.subjectagricultural historyen_US
dc.subjectgenderen_US
dc.subjectAmerican historyen_US
dc.subjectevergreenen_US
dc.titleControlling Christmas: an environmental history of natural and artificial treesen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Historyen_US
dc.publisher.collegeCollege of Arts and Sciencesen_US
dc.date.authorbirth1989-05-04
dc.subject.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.subject.majorHistoryen_US
dc.contributor.committeeGreene, Alison Collis
dc.contributor.committeeHersey, Mark D.
dc.contributor.committeeHui, Alexandra E.
dc.contributor.committeeBrain, Stephen C.
dc.date.defense2020-10-12
dc.rights.embargodescriptionComplete embargo for 2 yearsen_US
dc.rights.embargotermsComplete embargo for 2 yearsen_US
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2022-12-15
dc.date.graduation2020-11-25


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record