Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJacquin, Kristine
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Destin Nicole
dc.date2007
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T16:11:54Z
dc.date.available2019-10-08T16:11:54Z
dc.date.issued2007-06-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11668/16311
dc.description.abstractDespite the high incidence of rape in the United States, there are comparatively low rates of reports, arrests, and convictions. More research is needed to examine the factors that influence trial decisions for rape cases. This study examined the impact of a rape complainant?s willingness to ingest a chemical substance (willing or unwilling) and the type of ingested substance (alcohol, GHB, or marijuana) on the decisions of 229 mock jurors. Overall, jurors were biased by the complainant?s use of substances, the complainant?s choice about using, and by rape myths. The complainant?s use of alcohol, regardless of the willingness to use, led to the highest guilt ratings for the defendant. Complainants who willingly ingested a substance were viewed as less credible and more to blame for the rape, compared to those who unwillingly used a substance. The complainant was perceived as the most credible when she unwillingly ingested GHB or marijuana.
dc.publisherMississippi State University
dc.subject.lcshRape--Cases.
dc.subject.lcshJurors--Attitudes.
dc.subject.lcshDrugs and sex--Cases.
dc.subject.othersexual assult
dc.titleJuror perceptions in a rape trial :examining the complainant's ingestion of chemical substances prior to sexual assault
dc.typeThesis
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Psychology.
dc.date.authorbirth1983
dc.subject.degreeMaster of Science
dc.subject.majorClinical Psychology
dc.contributor.committeeEakin, Deborah
dc.contributor.committeeArmstrong, Kevin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record